The report demonstrates that the economic impacts of immigration are not unequivocally positive or negative, but are decisively influenced by the structure of immigration and the success of integration. Work-based and highly educated immigration clearly yields positive effects for public finances, whereas humanitarian immigration is initially a fiscal burden, although outcomes may improve with effective integration. Those who arrive for protection purposes tend to have lower employment rates and income levels compared to the native population for a prolonged period, even though these differences narrow as their length of stay increases.
In the context of an ageing population, immigration also has growing long-term significance. The shrinking working-age population reduces labour supply, productivity and the sustainability of public finances, and to reverse this trend Finland needs a higher net immigration than at present. Increasing work-based immigration in particular strengthens economic growth and the funding base of the welfare state.
The overall message is that the economic impacts of immigration are determined both by who moves to Finland and by how the country supports their integration. With appropriately targeted policies, immigration can enhance labour supply, increase productivity, and strengthen the sustainability of public finances even in the long term.
